Karl, Prototip has ajax and the things you've mentioned. If you are looking for ideas to improve cluetip, it might be a good idea to a look at it.
- Dean On Jun 8, 1:51 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Rey, for mentioning that. > > Dan, if you have a "design eye," the clueTip plugin is completely > skinnable. It comes with three preset themes, but I've seen a few 3rd > party implementations of it that are gorgeous. It's all in the CSS. > > Prototip looks great, but one thing you might want to consider is the > flexibility of the data source. At first glance, it looks like > Prototip requires you to use one of the function's arguments as the > tooltip's content. With the clueTip plugin, on the other hand, the > content can come from a separate file, from an element in the same > document, from the title attribute (or another attribute if specified) > of the invoking element, or from an optional argument of the cluetip() > method. It also has a number of options for various positioning > schemes and open/close triggers. If something doesn't work right or > look right, I'd love to hear how I can improve it. > > Cheers, > > --Karl > > ____________ > Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com > > On Jun 7, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Rey Bango wrote: > > > > > Dan, > > > I think has done a fabulous job with Prototip2. It's very feature > > rich and most likely the reason that he charges for his work. With > > that said, the solutions you've been presented are pretty good. To > > recap you can: > > > 1) Use prototip with jQuery using noConflict > > 2) Use clueTip which is also feature rich > > > If the concern you have is the aesthetics, I would suggest you bring > > that up to jQuery team member Karl Swedberg who is VERY open to > > updating clueTip and also in receiving help in making changes. I > > know he would appreciate another hand in making changes. > > > Rey... > > >> On Jun 2, 4:22 pm, Danjojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I really like the quality of the tooltip pop-ups found > >>> herehttp://www.nickstakenburg.com/projects/prototip2/ > > >>> What is the closest thing we have to this level of quality in > >>> jQuery? > > >>> Thanks, > >>> D
