My company is using it on our dev server, we'll most likely move it out to production sometime this winter. So far, it has turned out to be a great resource, especially for keeping all of our different apps on the same page and staying up to date on the latest library releases (in our case jQuery).
One question I'd like to ask: What resources has Google committed to this project to ensure availability? I've noticed that http://code.google.com has yet to switch to the Google AJAX Libraries API, are there any plans to do this in the future? - jake On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Jiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Great! > > It could be even better if you can have some most popular plugins > included. > > Thanks, > Jiming > > > On Jun 3, 2:55 am, Seth - TA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Scottus >> >> Nifty idea. >> >> Suggestion - Look to implement plugin options as well. Keeping track >> of versions is a benefit and the speed improvement is nice to a >> degree, but the biggest struggle is I hate having to have 5 or 6 >> <script> tags calling plugins. I hate combining them into on js file >> too, because then it is just an unreadable cluster. It would be nice >> to take plugins submitted by plugin authors and have a naming >> convention to also include these. That would drastically improve load >> times. You could utilize the plugin library which currently exists on >> jquery.com and add an option for the google name which is used to call >> the plugin. Just a thought. >> >> Seth >> >> On Jun 2, 12:36 pm, aldomatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Not yet, but I plan on using it here in a day or so. Looks intresting >> > so far. >> >> > On Jun 2, 12:16 pm, cfdvlpr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Is anyone using this for jQuery yet? To do this, you can just use >> > > this line of code, right? >> >> > > <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.2.6/ >> > > jquery.min.js"/> >
