I understand... I had just assumed (without thinking!) that the iframe was wrapped around the ul. I was having some problems in IE that seemed to be coming from the use of bgiframe. I've since looked through the entire set of screens and determined that I can probably get away with not using it (we've got about 70% IE6, unfortunately), which gets me past the issues for now. Thanks.
On May 14, 12:16 am, "Joel Birch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, that is invalid HTML. It is inserted in that position so that it > is "behind" the actual ul contents (the li elements). I guess the > resulting invalid HTML is a consequence we accept in exchange for a > much-needed fix for the IE bug. That said, bgIframe does not affect > IE7 or above, so I think it is not something worth worrying about. In > my opinion, IE6 is so broken that anything goes when it comes to bug > fixes. As long as the result is that it works like more modern > browsers, then personally I'm prepared to live with that and look > ahead to (hopefully) improved versions of IE. > > Joel Birch
