I'd be interesting in adding the checkbox handling, as Dave described
it, to the treeview plugin - as an optional module. The tree rendering
itself is quite solid for the treeview plugin, so that should be taken
as the basis. Contributions are welcome.

Jörn

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matt W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Yeah I actually have done another version that has the tri state,
>  perhaps I should include that and make it an option.  The idea on this
>  one is that if you select a child the parent has to be selected as
>  well.
>
>
>
>  On May 13, 7:47 pm, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Please feel free to tell me why its good, why its bad and how it can
>  > > be improved.
>  >
>  > I had to do something similar, but used the jQuery treeview and added
>  > the checkboxes myself. Neither yours nor mine really deal with the
>  > check box hierarchy in a very intuitive way. When only some of the
>  > boxes under a node are checked, it seems like that node's checkbox
>  > does not behave right.
>  >
>  > In Windows you get the gray tristate checkbox for those situations.
>  > Clicking the checkbox in that state checks it and selects all
>  > descendants; clicking it again clears it and deselects all
>  > descendants. I didn't implement that but I did feel guilty about
>  > it. :-)
>

Reply via email to