Well that's painfully obvious... why didn't I think of that? thanks for helping me look stupid, only 9 more till I fill my usual daily quota =P (j/k)
Thanks :) On Apr 29, 12:17 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd recommend just using conditional comments to load the bgiframe plugin > for IE 6 only. > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512(VS.85).aspx > > -- > Brandon Aaron > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Aaron Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I looked but couldn't find anything on this. So hopefully this isn't > > a repeat. > > > It's great that we have bgiframe to compensate for the sorry excuse > > that is IE6, but it kind of sucks that we have to include it for all > > browsers even though no one else needs it (both filesize [albeit > > small] and the extra http request). > > > With that in mind, is there any issue with the following: > > > <script type="text/javascript"> > > if($.browser.msie&&parseInt($.browser.version)<=6) $.getScript("path/ > > to/bgiframe.js"); > > </script> > > > So if that were called after the inclusion of jquery.js and before any > > plugins that may need to use bgiframe... would it work correctly? Any > > issue with loading bgiframe via the getScript method? > > > Thanks, > > > Aaron Barker
