grin :)

On Apr 5, 4:00 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow! I think this counts as the first marriage proposal on the jQuery
> discussion list.
>
> --Karl
> _________________
> Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
>
> On Apr 4, 2008, at 5:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > OMG, you're a genius! (OK, you knew that.) Only tried it in a live
> > edit on FF so far, but the result's great!
> > THANK YOU!!!!
>
> > Will you marry me? ;)
>
> > On Apr 4, 9:55 pm, "Mike Alsup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi, Mike, are you still here? Your advice was good - but Cycle is
> >>> still trying to show *all* the 'slides' in one frame. The effect's
> >>> quite funny in ie7 ... Am I calling Cycle wrongly?
> >>> ....................................
> >>>         $('#two').cycle({
> >>>    fx: 'fade',
> >>>    speed: 2500,
> >>>        delay: -1000
> >>>  });
> >>>         $('#three').cycle({
> >>>    fx: 'fade',
> >>>        speed: 2500,
> >>>        delay: -2000
> >>>  });
> >>> ...................................... etc......
>
> >> Your script looks ok but I think you still have css issues.  You need
> >> to give those containers explicit demensions so they don't collapse
> >> to
> >> zero.  Note the first line below is meant to style both the slide and
> >> the slide container.
>
> >> .slideshow, .slideshow a { width: 136px; height: 110px;
> >> display:block; }
> >> .slideshow img { width: 110px; height: 110px; display: block }

Reply via email to