Aha! My good reason(s) were that an earlier beta repeatedly crashed my
machine, and I'm fed up with Apple's creeping-startup-takeover
strategy. But the current Safari version installed without a hitch; I
guess I'll have to either live with the startups, or spend some time
killing them ;) Thanks for the heads-up TT!
The page looks the same in Safari as in Firefox & ie (phew!).
So what's up with Opera?
On Feb 21, 1:54 am, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Safari for Windows is a pretty good browser now, especially if you
> want to have a good idea whether you'll run on Mac Safari (and
> iPhone). Is there a reason you're not testing with it as well?
>
> On Feb 20, 3:45 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Admittedly, the function in question is my own home-fudged one. It
> > depends on:
>
> > $('<img src="' + '/images/thelogo.png' + '#' + Math.random() + '"/
>
> > >' ).load(function() {
>
> > Firefox and IE (hurrah) behave as required. Opera doesn't register the
> > changed 'variable' (an .html() function), but loads the no-images
> > stylesheet anyway. Do you understand why this might be?
> > As I haven't got a Mac, I tend to trust that Opera will be at least as
> > demanding as Safari. The thought of all Mac and Opera users getting
> > the image-free version by default scares me to death!
>
> > I haven't found any relevant documentation. I know this group houses
> > some really hot browser experts - so am pleading for insight &
> > advice ...
>
> > Cherry :/
