No problem, Michael. I was just trying to take shortcut on a page I'm developing. As Mike stated, what I did was invalid HTML anyway, so it's not to be done.
As soon as I changed it to a normal text link, it worked perfectly! Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Michael J. > I. Jackson > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:59 PM > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Can't get new Shadowbox plug-in to work. :o( > > > Hmm...that's kind of strange. I'm in class right now but I'll look > into it this weekend as soon as I get a minute! > > Michael > > On Jan 25, 2008 1:51 PM, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well. you were spot on, Mike. > > > > > > > > That was enough to stop the plug-in dead in its tracks. > > > > > > > > I thought about that but didn't try it first. :o/ > > > > > > > > Thanks, Mike! > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Mike Alsup > > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:35 PM > > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Can't get new Shadowbox plug-in to work. :o( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only part that strays from the demo is what I've wrapped the > > <a> tag around... a div I already had on the page with an image > > placed in its background via CSS. But I really don't see why that > > would matter > > > > > > > > Well, it makes the markup invalid for starters.
