Klaus,
Good point.  I was just using "red" for communication/example sake.  It
should be "alert" or whatever.

Glen

On Jan 7, 2008 2:02 PM, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On 7 Jan., 22:40, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You might better off using CSS instead of the background= for a couple
> of
> > reasons.
> >
> > <td width="90" align="center" background="images/rboxbg.jpg" > becomes
> > <td class="col4 red menu">
> >
> > td.col4 {width: 90px}
> > td.red {background: #ff0000 url(images/rboxbg.jpg);}
>
> I'd recommend not to use presentational class naming ("red"). Once you
> change the color to blue, you need to change the class name as well,
> at least if you want to make it some sense and not confuse others (co-
> workers and yourself after 3 month).
>
> Naming it "red" isn't much better than the way it is. Think of the
> purpose or structural meaning of an element when going for a class
> name, not of its (current!) presentation.
>
>
> --Klaus
>
>

Reply via email to