I'm not sure which one is faster but instead of $
("tr.Grid_Item,tr.Grid_AltItem"), maybe $
("tr").filter('.Grid_Item,.Grid_AltItem') is faster.
Also instead of calling 3 times $(this), you can do: var $this = $
(this); $this.......
Ariel Flesler
On Dec 3, 5:57 am, Suni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might help a bit (not tested):
>
> jQuery("tr.Grid_Item,tr.Grid_AltItem").each( function() { // Use tr to
> skip checking nont-tr-elements
> var td_nodes = jQuery(this).find('td'); // Get the td nodes
> with a single select and store them in a variable
>
> var Id = td_nodes.eq(2).text();
> var foo = td_nodes.eq(8).firstchild.attr("value");
> var bar = td_nodes.eq(9).firstchild.attr("value");
> });
>
> There are other ways to optimize things but for further advice more
> info would be needed on what you are actually trying to accomplish.
> Looping over thousands of rows and dynamically fetching data is bound
> to be a bit slow, as DOM-access always has it's overhead. There are
> other more efficient ways to accomplish the same things, usually (such
> as storing all the necessary data in a javascript-object which gets
> updated when the values change. You can get _much_ faster response
> from getting / calculating the values from there when you need them,
> instead of looping all over the DOM every time).
