Very nice, thank you. I think the swfObject wasn't implemented
correctly and that is why I strayed from it.
Thanks.
On Nov 27, 4:22 pm, bbuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just finished up a site that used SuperFish and swfObject (and Cycle
> and idTabs and Accordion...), although I'm using jQuery 1.1.4 still.
> You don't need to re-output the SWF to get the transparent background,
> you just need to add a paramater to the swfObject setup code:
>
> so.addParam("wmode", "transparent");
>
> That should be enough to ensure that your CSS layers appear on top of
> the SWF. I did run into a problem with Firefox on Mac that had to do
> with an Opacity bug. That's an issue with the plugin, and not jQuery/
> Superfish.
>
> Here's a link to the Superfish plugin:
>
> http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish
>
> And here's a blog post about the FF Flash bug:
>
> http://jakeo.org/blog/2007/03/16/css-opacity-and-flash-transparency-i...
>
> Oh, and if anyone is interested in a two relaunched sites using
> jQuery:
>
> http://www.laphil.comhttp://www.hollywoodbowl.com
>
> - bry
>
> On Nov 27, 2:04 pm, Jay Fallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Awhile ago I implemented a basic menu based on jQuery/Suckerfish(<a
> > href="http://be.twixt.us/jquery/suckerFish.php";></a>), and I never
> > realized the implications of the menu appearing behind a flash object
> > until said object became available.
>
> > I've read though the posts and I've seen some talk about solutions,
> > but as of yet I haven't seen anything that worked in the wild.
>
> > My current implementation uses the latest jQuery.js and I've tried to
> > implement the flash object using swfObject.js (which causes a conflict
> > with other scripts), jMedia.js and jquery.flash.js, along with
> > bgiframe.js but as of yet I have not been successful.
>
> > Has anyone been able to overcome this problem? I don't have access to
> > the Flash IDE at the moment, so I'll try and get it working with a
> > transparent background, but if anyone has actually implemented a fix,
> > I'd be really appreciative.
>
> > Thanks.
