Hi, I had the same experience as Tane. In the beginning, because of the JQuery's bug that non-root level script cannnot be evaluated after Ajax call in 1.2 release, I used livequery a lot, and did find that the page was not very responsive. The performance is getting better after I removed some of them.
Regards, Changsu On Nov 1, 1:33 am, "Tane Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's my 2p > > I've recently been using livequery a lot on my pastebin app - however > I've been taking it out again, and I really wonder if it should be > core? > > Don't get me wrong, it is a great plugin - however I think it breeds > bad (lazy) design in Ajax apps as it lacks > > and I wonder if it's really that fast? Since taking a lot of > livequery out I've noticed speed improvments in my app. > > On 01/11/2007, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to see livequery in the core, but John believes that its rate > > of adoption is too slow to justify getting it in the core. If that's the > > case, I want to know why, since it fundamentally improves on core jQuery > > concepts in (like I said above), what I believe to be the most innovative > > improvement to the jQuery paradigm since its inception. > > If you use it, please speak up! If not, why not? > > > -- Yehuda > > > On 10/31/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What makes you think the adoption rate is slow? I get the feeling > > > that a good number of people are using it. > > > > > So as far as I'm concerned, livequery is the biggest advance in jQuery > > > since > > > > its inception (no, I am not its author). I'm trying to understand why > > > it's > > > > having such a slow rate of adoption. > > > -- > > Yehuda Katz > > Web Developer | Procore Technologies > > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > -- > Tane Piper > Blog -http://digitalspaghetti.me.uk > AJAX Pastebin -http://pastemonkey.org > > This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
