@Micha - If you look closer at popwincal & the differences, I think it's a bit more complicated than that. I agree with Graeme - the thing I like best about popwincal is the simpler/slicker header area, mainly the fact that popwincal fits the important date controls onto one, clean thin control area. Granted some changes like the colors, images for next/prev & removing the calendar borders is easy via CSS like you mentioned, and a few of the the other differences like 3-letter day abbreviations can be accomplished through Datepicker config options.
However Popwincal does not use select boxes for the month & year dropdowns which would make styling those items a lot more flexible. Also the way the Datepicker html is coded, there's a container div wrapped around the month/year section that also includes the calendar table, which makes it nearly impossible to cleanly arrange the prev/ next controls in the same horizontal area as the month/year control, like popwincal has. Some feature requests & other comments: - a few config options for the positioning behavior would be great, to control: 1) where the calendar flys out (i.e. to the side of the trigger element rather than below) & 2) enable/disable the auto- reposition based on available screen area. - a config option to turn off the day-of-the-week links. Neat feature but it seems to me like a lot of users would click on a day header by accident & find the reorganized calendar confusing. Thanks for the plugin, awesome job. On Nov 1, 11:08 am, Michael Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graeme B. Davis schrieb:> Is there a way to apply a style it so that it looks > a bit "better"? Perhaps > > like this calendar I've been using on my sites for ~6yrs: > > >http://www.ssw.com.au/ssw/Standards/DeveloperGeneral/Images/popupCale... > > f > >http://www.peterbe.com/plog/blogitem-20031017-1526/popwincal > > > I like the jquery calendar, but feel it doesn't look as good as it could... > > no offense, but: > have you even looked at the example site ? > > there's a tab that says "Stylesheets". I guess that's (nearly) all you need. > > micha
