Please PLEASE keep them separate, I don't understand why this is an
issue. If you're doing stuff with jQuery UI, please post the issues in
the jQuery UI list. If you're only using jQuery + other plugins, post
in the main list. Simple.

--John

On 9/17/07, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tend to agree with Andy...
>
> Is it *really* necessary to divide the conversations about jQuery and its UI
> into two separate mailing lists?  Will the subject matter for each list have
> more or less in common with each other?
>
> If the subject matter tends to overlap, combine the lists.
> If the subject matter on jQuery tends to have little or nothing to do with
> it's UI, then keep the two separate.
>
> However, I would believe that the subject matter will overlaps tremendously
> between the two lists.
>
> Rick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Andy Matthews
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:22 AM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery UI praises and questions
>
>
> I'd say that now that the UI is released, questions/comments can and should
> be posted to THIS list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John Resig
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:01 AM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery UI praises and questions
>
>
> Good call - I just went back and added dependency information to all the
> components - yes, it's possible to use them separately.
>
> I'll have to flush out the docs on this some more, once I'm awake.
>
> --John
>
> On 9/17/07, David Duymelinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Great work on the jQuery UI, I take my hat off for all who worked on
> > it, keep it up and keep amazing us!!
> >
> > In the docs it isn't mentioned which version of jQuery you have to use
> > and if it's possible to use the compontents separate?
> >
> > ps : other jQuery UI question i will post in the jQuery UI list.
> >
> > --
> > David Duymelinck
> > ________________
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to