another reason i can think of:
sometimes, you don't want to include jquery plugin in the <head />,
since maybe header.template is shared, then you put the include plugin
codes into the templates only want to show the effect, this came to a
problem...putting css into body failed the html validation.
On 9月13日, 下午6時55分, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> > More & more plugins are using CSS to style the layout, this is good,
> > but their didn't aware of if user browser don't know javascript, it is
> > useless to load the CSS, e.g. thickbox
>
> > <script type="text/javascript" src="path-to-file/thickbox.js"></
> > script>
> > <link rel="stylesheet" href="path-to-file/thickbox.css" type="text/
> > css" media="screen" />
>
> > can be better:
>
> > <script type="text/javascript" src="path-to-file/thickbox.js"></
> > script>
> > <script>
> > document.write('<link rel="stylesheet" href="path-to-file/
> > thickbox.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />');
> > </script>
>
> Most userse do have JS active. The overall overhead in bytes downloaded for
> thickbox.css where it is not needed is smaller than the overhead of bytes you
> introduce with your additional script tag for all users. In most cases it is
> better to load the unused stylesheet.
>
> Christof- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
