i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement...
thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature...
On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to report also a 100% no-conflict upgrade to 1.2! Thanks
> for the hard work and the quick output.
>
> That being said, I can't get offset() to work like expected. I use
> Dimensions offset() on my site in a tricky situation involving floats,
> padding, margin, etc. I tried to switch into offset() from the 1.2
> core and I can't get it to work as expected, and I can't seem to
> pinpoint where it is failing. I tried to alter it slightly to pass it
> a different parentNode (as in Dimensions { relativeTo: element }) but
> the left: was still wrong. I also get different results from FF
> 2.0.0.6, IE6, and Opera 9.20.
>
> Can you describe how the core offset() method works compared to the
> Dimensions offset() method? I know from the source the Dimensions
> offset() takes into account many different special cases, and
> offsetLite seems closer to core offset(), but not the same. I would
> like to add the info into the Wiki so coders will know when to use
> Dimensions and when core offset() is enough.
>
> When I get home from work I'll try to get an example up, right now the
> site is back to Dimensions until I figure this out.
>
> Charles
> doublerebel.com
>
> On Sep 12, 8:58 am, "Web Specialist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Jörn,
>
> > I know your great job in form validation plugin. Form Validation Plugin is
> > awesome. Period!
>
> > I'll waiting that improvements looking for better performance.
>
> > Thanks!
>
> > 2007/9/12, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > Bernd Matzner schrieb:
>
> > > >> I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
> > > >> 1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
> > > >> uncompressed
> > > >> version returns in 6 sec.
>
> > > > Hi, somewhat unrelated to the thread: 6 or even 16 secs seem like an
> > > > eternity. What would be the disadvantages of using server-side
> > > > validation in such a case? I'm asking this because I keep wondering if
> > > > server-side validation is necessary anyway for non-JS visitors, why
> > > > not use Ajax and do the validation on the server and simply display
> > > > the errors using JS if available...
>
> > > Please note that I never even tried to optimize the validation plugin
> > > for performance. I never had to deal with "monster forms", and still
> > > consider them problematic anyway. But it seems like there are quite a
> > > few people who have to deal with those monster forms, once I've got a
> > > testcase setup it should be possible to improve the performance a lot. I
> > > just have to find the actual bottleneck.
>
> > > I guess serializing a monster form and sending it via ajax and then
> > > displaying messages via JS won't be that much faster.
>
> > > -- Jörn
