The Safari version is actually the WebKit build number. Which is 413 for
Safari 2.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 8/29/07, Karl Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> If you're using jQuery 1.1.3 or later you can test for the version of
> Safari really easily:
>
> if ( $.browser.safari && parseFloat($.browser.version) < 2 ) {
> // Do stuff for Safari version < 2
> }
>
> Karl Rudd
>
> On 8/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I love jquery, the only issue I have is the non-graceful degradation
> > of some methods with mainly Safari Ver < 2.
> > I understand this browser is outdated, and perhaps the worst browser
> > out there, but my colleagues at work still use it.
> > If some of the features of jquery are not available for safari 1x, why
> > not make it degrade gracefully?
> > For instance, I want to show() a division layer, that has set
> > display:none.
> > If safari 1x does not support the opacity effects, then why not
> > degrade to simply changing the container style to display:block,
> > instead of returning and doing nothing?
> > I think this would be a great advantage if jquery could do this, i
> > would like to know why jquery does not support "graceful degradation".
> > Thank you for any comments.
> >
> >
>
