Ultimately this is how rumors get started; my bad on the kid thing. But
having one is a great thing, give you a totally different perspective or
everything.
On 8/16/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Haha, you almost had me frightened there ("does he know something that
> I don't?").
>
> But yeah, the Learning jQuery Book is definitely a different brand of
> baby.
>
> --John
>
> On 8/15/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, don't I look like a dumbass :) I apparently was referring to this
> > post that I guess I never actually read:
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/f1706b9f5c1da82b/fdf9ac5f7e90d1eb?lnk=gst&q=resig&rnum=41#fdf9ac5f7e90d1eb
> >
> > I need sleep...
> >
> >
> > On 8/16/07, Karl Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm guessing he's getting you confused with Dries, of Drupal fame. :)
> > >
> > > Karl Rudd
> > >
> > > On 8/16/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a kid? I sure hope not! :-)
> > > >
> > > > --John
> > > >
> > > > On 8/15/07, Benjamin Sterling
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Ok, I had my kid back in January and I am just recently getting
> time
> > to work
> > > > > on my side projects. So where, after only, what, a month or so
> are
> > you
> > > > > getting the time and energy to patch things so quickly?
> > > > >
> > > > > I will try to grab that version tonight, if not, sometime
> tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/15/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was feeling feisty. Fixed in SVN rev 2728. Check a copy out of
> SVN
> > > > > > to give it a try (but the test case passes).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/15/07, Benjamin Sterling <
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > @Stephan: That is actually the first site I went to (and go
> to
> > often)
> > > > > when
> > > > > > > I started running into the problem figure I was not following
> > standards.
> > > > > > > And I tried the prepend and prependTo and neither worked, but
> > prepend
> > > > > > > errored out where prependTo did not.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @John: Will do, I want to experiment on a few more things to
> see
> > if I
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > find a work around, either way I will post it sometime
> tonight.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Erik: Are you suggesting we should change "write less. do
> more"
> > to
> > > > > "doing
> > > > > > > shady trickery so you don't have to." :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for your help guys.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/15/07, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > "jQuery: doing shady trickery so you don't have to."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --Erik
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/15/07, John Resig < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That being said, we have to do a lot of shady trickery to
> make
> > > > > > > > > table-related things work properly.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @Benjamin: You should file a bug on this:
> > > > > > > > > http://dev.jquery.com/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --John
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 8/15/07, Stephan Beal < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 16, 3:56 am, "Benjamin Sterling"
> > > > > > > > > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to build a table dynamically, but jQuery
> keep
> > > > > erroring
> > > > > > > out on
> > > > > > > > > > > $('<table>').append('<caption>'); Is
> > caption
> > > > > > > supported?
> > > > > > > > > > > $('<table>').append('<tbody>'); works fine.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > it's not jQuery which is ignoring your request. jQuery
> > indirectly
> > > > > uses
> > > > > > > > > > the browser's internal facilities for creating DOM
> trees,
> > which
> > > > > means
> > > > > > > > > > that the browser's engine is the one denying you.
> According
> > to
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > site:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_caption.asp
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the caption must be the first tag after TABLE, before
> TBODY
> > (if
> > > > > any).
> > > > > > > > > > But after some experimentation via their "try it" link,
> i
> > couldn't
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > it to fail either way, but maybe konqueror is especially
> > tollerant
> > > > > > > > > > ( i.e., not compliant) here.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My guess is that when you create your <table> the TBODY
> is
> > > > > > > > > > automatically getting added to it (someone posted
> > complaining
> > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > that behaviour a few days ago), which means that your
> > > > > append(caption)
> > > > > > > > > > will fail and your append(tbody) is actually NOT working
> > because
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > tbody is already in the table when that is reached. But
> > that's a
> > > > > > > > > > guess. Try inspecting the dom after you create the
> table,
> > before
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > append the caption/tbody.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Benjamin Sterling
> > > > > > > http://www.KenzoMedia.com
> > > > > > > http://www.KenzoHosting.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Benjamin Sterling
> > > > > http://www.KenzoMedia.com
> > > > > http://www.KenzoHosting.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Benjamin Sterling
> > http://www.KenzoMedia.com
> > http://www.KenzoHosting.com
>
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
