> btw: the example doesn't work in Safari 2.0.3 I don't have a mac to test that sort of stuff. (Though to be fair I could've tested Safari 3 in windows...)
Anyways, this is not a production plugin. I wrote it haphazardly and didn't test it *anywhere.* I wrote it so that it worked and looked decent in firefox 2. Anything beyond that is divine providence. -blair On Aug 13, 8:34 am, "Txt.Vaska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wish i could do this with background images... > > is it even possible to animate a background image? > > ;) > > btw: the example doesn't work in Safari 2.0.3 > > On 11 Aug 2007, at 06:21, Blair Mitchelmore wrote: > > > > > (I'm not sure if this is a double post, I tried to post earlier...) > > > Here's my (40 line) proof of concept. It's not as foolproof as the > > original especially regarding the positioning of the resultant element > > (the original took a link and changed it to an em in a span in a span > > in a span in a fieldset in a link with each nested level having > > certain margins and styles to make it all come out rosy, whereas mine > > uses the bare minimum of nesting and a bizarre height nudging > > algorithm so its glitchy when the font gets really big or really > > small). > > > Source code: > >http://jquery.offput.ca/js/jquery.scrollover.js > > > Simple (even for my standards) demo: > >http://jquery.offput.ca/scrollover/ > > > -blair > > > On Aug 9, 11:59 am, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hiya! > > >> i just found this via digg: > > >>http://www.scrollovers.com/ > > >> and i thought that might be a tempting animation effect for one of > >> the > >> more talented plugin authors out there. > > >> The implementation code is 175 lines long, but i'd bet that one of > >> you > >> jQuery gurus can get it down to 20 or less. > > >> :)
