Umm... You didn't really just say Web 1.0, did you? sad sad world we live in :)
On 8/9/07, Tane Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dan, > > I totally agree - it reminds me of Web 1.0 and using the blink tag, > the page was just missing a few animated gifs and an "under > construction" gif to top it off. > > I do see other more fun uses for it though: how about a quiz where > you see the question, and hover over to get this effect to show the > answer. > > In terms of UI though, it's not that great. > > > On 09/08/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Klaus, > > > > >Nice effect! > > > > > >But hey, creating a new domain and on top calling it "A new way of > > >linking" is a little over the top I think ;-) > > > > > >If all the links on a page would constantly behave like that I'd go > > >crazy - man, that would be annoying... > > > > When I first saw that page a couple of days ago, the first thought I had > is: > > Ok, so what UI benefit does this offer the user? > > > > While eye candy can be nice, I don't really see any benefit to the user. > I'm > > very much a form over factor guy, so I want to make sure if I'm > introducing > > new behaviors that they're benefiting the user (at least I try to make > that > > happen--some times a client demands something that is purely for eye > candy.) > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > -- > Tane Piper > http://digitalspaghetti.me.uk > > This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private > -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com
