I did some more testing on my end. If I create all of the html first using the array join method for concatenation, and then .append() once instead of .append()ing 1,000 times, then I'm showing about 90% improvement in speed. Not too shabby.
On Aug 7, 3:40 pm, Josh Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a project that makes a web service call and pulls back > data. Sometimes that data can be 1,000ish rows. What is the fastest > way that I can create those rows? Right now I'm just doing string > concatenation to make HTML and passing that to the .append method. I > read the other day where someone(Klaus?) said that array.join was a > faster way to do string concatenation. > > I'd like to avoid the string concats all together if there is a faster > method. I'm just poking around for ideas. > > Thanks > Josh
