thanks aaron, just in case you need my email, it is ganeshread at gmail dot com.
-GTG On 7/17/07, Aaron Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll try to package it up and make it available tomorrow. Aaron Ganeshji Marwaha wrote: > Aaron, > > I would like the jar file... I want to integrate this packer along > with my ant build script... > > -GTG > > > On 7/14/07, *Aaron Porter* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > I just ran some tests against the current version from SVN to see how > fast they load on my machine. > > Firefox 2.0.0.4 <http://2.0.0.4> on Linux: > jquery.js (original uncompressed) - 158243 bytes: 66ms > jquery.pack.js - 21585 bytes: 129ms > jquery.compressed.js (my compressor) - 17005 bytes: 394ms > > > IE6 on XP under VMWare on the same Linux machine: > jquery.js (original uncompressed) - 158243 bytes: 15ms > jquery.pack.js - 21585 bytes: 62ms > jquery.compressed.js (my compressor) - 17005 bytes: 171ms > > On a 56K modem my version will be faster on the first load then the > packed version will be faster on subsequent loads. It all depends on > what you're after. > > I haven't made the source available yet but that's something I'm > considering. I'll need to clean it up first. I could get you a jar > file > (it's written in Java) if you're interested. > > Aaron > > Michael Geary wrote: > > Sounds interesting, Aaron, thanks for the pointer. > > > > Two questions: > > > > How is the unpacking speed? I don't care how long it takes to > pack the code > > (within reason), but unpacking speed is very important, > especially on slow > > machines like an iPhone/Nokia/Windows Mobile phone. I saw a test > report that > > seemed to indicate that Dean's packer took 1.5 seconds to unpack > jQuery on > > the iPhone, which is way too slow. I would gladly take a slower > packing time > > to get faster unpacking. > > > > Is the source code available? I can't use a compressor that I > have to go to > > a website to use. That's fine for testing, but for production > use I need to > > be able to integrate it into my build process and have it > available at all > > times. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Mike > > > > > >> From: Aaron Porter > >> > >> I know Dean Edward's packer has already been suggested but > >> you can try my compressor if you'd like: > >> > >> > http://www.scriptingmagic.com/Topics/Compression/JavaScript%20Compressor/ > >> > >> My compressor is slower than packer but the results will be > >> smaller. It also doesn't have a problem with things like > >> missing semi-colons at the end of lines because it uses Rhino > >> for the first pass which cleans everything up. > >> > > > > > >
