Erik thanks, Just had a friend test on Firefox 2 on Mac OS X, and he had no problem, are you on the same platform? I think possibly it's a Windows issue only.
Created new example pages to better demonstrate. This page: http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/index1.html The top table is unmodified and the bottom one should be in should be fully jqueried up. However in Firefox 2 (2.0.0.4 here, not sure about 1 or 1.5etc) the border styles around the td's/th's in the table body aren't rendered (though the class names are correctly applied). On this page (with Firebug installed): http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/index2.html It renders it correctly with a console.log($("table.prices1")) 'hack'. Will On Jul 17, 12:37 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure what problem you're having. The pages appear to render > identically in FF and Safari... What about it do you think isn't > working right? > > In looking through the generated source in firebug, it appears that > all of your classes are getting added to the correct elements... > > Actually, upon closer inspection, there is a small 1px white line > between the column headers in FF that isn't in Safari, but it isn't > bad, and is probably the result of a rendering difference between the > browsers, not a jQuery issue. > > --Erik > > On 7/16/07, Will Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Not sure if this is a bug or not, but Firefox seems not to properly > > apply a series of class names. > > > Here's the example > >http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/short-css.html > > > with a 'console.log' to fix the firefox rendering. > >http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/short-css-firefox-fix.html > > > Thinking that this might be to with specificity I did a version with > > more verbose CSS. > >http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/verbose-css.html > >http://www.logicbox.net/jquery/pricetable/verbose-css-firefox-fix.html > > > Again the same problem crops up in Firefox. They all work fine in > > IE6/7, Safari 3beta etc. > > > Very odd, any ideas? This one's been annoying me for a while now! > > > Thanks, > > Will
