For the time being, I think it should be a plugin, maybe one that adds to/extends the .animate() function.
But I would argue that there has to be some real world examples created. Maybe take a plugin that does some animation already and recreate it using the css method. For instance, I have a site informationexperts.com that uses the accordian plugin, if we can recreate that plugin to utilize the css method, that we can really gauge the benefit. The accordian plugin is only an example, I am sure there are a ton of plugin/situations that are already using current methods that can be recoded with the css method. This would really give us something to compare too, because moving 100 or so divs is one thing, having a real live site example is another. Back to something someone said in an earlier message, some of these test are suspect and I feel you can only truly judge something once you see it on the playing field. On 7/6/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so to go back to the original intent of this thread: Does it make sense to consider changing how jQuery (core) executes animations? Or is this something that should be a plugin? It makes animations much more predictable and efficient, but are there enough real world use cases. Glen On 7/6/07, Sean Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/6/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a question. > > Take a look at this page: > > http://www.commadot.com/jquery/animate/animatetest.htm > > Hey Glen, I liked your example, so I've taken it and applied the css > animation concept. > http://www.sunsean.com/animatetest.html > > The results are incredible. > > ~Sean >
-- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com
