What's better than asking, is testing..
<div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
<img src="path to image"/>
</div>
Much better.. Sorry if you felt I've wasted your time.
On 5 Jul., 03:25, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin.
>
> I would like to put visibility: hidden in my css for the elements
> (it's thirty something divs with an image set as background) and then
> use jQuery to display them. But so far I haven't had any success with
> that approach - it only works if I set the css to display:none. By
> doing so the browser won't download the images until the style is
> changed (which is what jQuery does) but that looks awful in IE6. I
> thought about just turning it off if it's IE6 (it's just eye candy)
> but I'm not sure how to distinguish between IE6 and IE7. Sadly jQuery
> only offers $.browser.msie. I've been digging in Ext to see how they
> do it but only found isIE flag code. And I'm running out of time
> so... :-( puh I'm gonna grab another cup of coffee..
>
> Do you think it would work if I use
> <div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
> <img src="path to image"/>
> </div>
> instead of background images?
>
> On 5 Jul., 03:01, "Benjamin Sterling"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jon,
> > I don't completely understand what you are asking for; Are you asking if
> > there is a way to "preload" images and have them hidden with out
> > display:none?
>
> > If so:
>
> > <div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
> > <img src="path to image"/>
> > </div>
>
> > Are you asking for filter out elements with display:none?
>
> > If so:
>
> > $('*').filter(':hidden'); // I may be wrong on this one
>
> > On 7/4/07, Jon Ege Ronnenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi all!
>
> > > Is it possible to show elements that is not CSS display:none;? In my case
> > > I'm showing some pictures and I don't like that the browser only downloads
> > > the pictures when I show them through jQuery. I would prefer if the
> > > browser
> > > downloaded all the pictures and then I would show them though jQuery. I
> > > know
> > > I can do it by changing the CSS instead of using show(), animate,
> > > slideDown
> > > etc. But I like the easing effect and I'm not sure of to achieve that by
> > > setting css.
>
> > > Any ideas to a workaround or someone who can explain to me why jQuery took
> > > this approach?
>
> > > Thanks!
>
> > > Don't misunderstand me - I really like jQuery (and especially its
> > > simplicity).
>
> > --
> > Benjamin Sterlinghttp://www.KenzoMedia.comhttp://www.KenzoHosting.com
