>> You can try the powerful .filter() method with an anonymous
>> function as its argument:
>>
>> $('someElement').filter(function() {
>> return $(this).text() == 'Some text';
>> });
>
> I will try this, thanks!
It works well!
Do you think it is usefull, for performance, to first filter
with :contains() before using .filter()?
$('#indirectly > ol > li > a:contains(' + related +
')').filter(function() {
return ($(this)[0].textContent == related);
}).parent().show('slow');
vs
$('#indirectly > ol > li > a').filter(function() {
return ($(this)[0].textContent == related);
}).parent().show('slow');
("related" comes from previous code)
I tried to profile both with Firebug, with not much difference, but I
don't have a lot of data to parse yet.
-Nicolas
--
Nicolas "Brush" HOIZEY
Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/
Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/
Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
