On Sunday 24 June 2007, John Resig wrote: > Just to clarify: This was an issue in jQuery 1.1.3a - we've fixed the > code in jQuery to fall back to 'linear' if it exists (thus causing > the code to work, no problem). This fix is in SVN right now and will > be in the final 1.1.3 release.
I'm wondering, wouldn't it be more appropriate if the easing plugin added to the jQuery.easing namespace instead of overwriting it? Something like jQuery.extend(jQuery.easing, { ... }); Then, easing functions already defined elsewhere would only be replaced if there actually was another implementation of them. Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.schuerig.de/michael/