Hi Jack,
I've never used it but my suggestion is to take a small section of your
code that is noticeably slower, create a test file, & drop the slow code
in there. Then create a second file and use straight jQuery core
functions or DOM code to do the same thing.
Leverage FireBug's profiler to see the performance of the two and
hopefully that will give you an indication as to whether jQuick is the
culprit or if other changes affected your page.
If you're not quite sure how to use FB's profiler, check out the
following article as it offers a nice explanation of it.
http://ddj.com/dept/debug/196802787?pgno=6
Also, check it out in multiple browsers to see if the issue are
consistent across all browsers or specific to one.
Rey...
Jack Killpatrick wrote:
Earlier today I converted some string concat js stuff (for creating
HTML) to use the jquick plugin instead:
http://jquick.sullof.com/jquick/
Things now seem noticably slower, but I also changed a bunch of other
stuff in the code I'm working on. I haven't dug in deeper to see where
the speed issue might be, but am wondering if anyone has used jquick
much and can vouch for it's speed (or has noticed it causing bottlenecks)?
Thanks,
Jack
--
BrightLight Development, LLC.
954-775-1111 (o)
954-600-2726 (c)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iambright.com
