On May 31, 8:38 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for coming over and getting more feedback on jQuery, Marty. The
> community is very supportive of this project so anything that's written
> which may not be 100% on target will be scrutinized. Even better,
> though, is the fact that we try to work with the author in question to
> ensure accuracy in the hopes of getting the information updated.
>
> Thanks again for coming over and please feel free to ask any questions.
> We're here to help.
>
> Rey Bango
> jQuery Team
>
>
>
> martykube wrote:
>
> > On May 21, 4:22 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>> Rey, I'm a little dense here, but not exactly sure what he is trying to
> >>> say
> >>> with this line:
> >>> "However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
> >>> oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
> >>> code to be a good asset to your project"
> >>> can anyone clarify. Is this a compliment or a knock against jquery?
> >> I think they mean it as a knock, but I don't agree with the statement.
>
> >> While it's true the plug-in architecture isn't a true OO model, you can
> >> definitely build re-usable logic using the plug-ins.
>
> >> And there's nothing preventing you to building all your code OO-based and
> >> using jQuery to interact w/the DOM. In a nutshell, that's what jQuery
> >> really
> >> is--a DOM helper.
>
> >> -Dan
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm one of the authors of the article.
>
> > JQuery is obviously a solid product with a great following.
>
> > Here are my apologies for any offense given, no knock was intended.
>
> > You've raised some good points here. I'll post a comment on the
> > article back to this thread.
>
> > Regards
>
> > MartyKube- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Rey,
Next time I write someting about jQuery, I'll send it here for a pre-
publication review :-)
I attempted to post a comment on Mr. Bool linking to this thread.
But alas, I was thwarted by Mr. Bool's broken, anti-spam protection.
We'll take a look at updating the content of the article.
Regards,
Marty
