jQuery is open source. even if all the developers who have contributed to it took off on a space ship, there would still be jquery!
I understand your pain because you fell for Microsoft hype. You put your trust in the untrustworthy! jQuery is understandable; every bit of code I write , I know pretty much what it's actually doing. I chose jQuery, not because I couldn't do the work, but because it's easier, more fun, and really really works. And I don't want to debug the weirdnesses of Microsoft Internet Explorer! Does that mean it's future proof? I don't know. But in jQuery I trust. On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am starting an asp.net project, and I would like to use javascript and client-side xml processing to make for a more responsive interface. Initial prototypes look good, but actually getting the xml using asp.net seems a bit tricky. A <xml> data island worked well, but this element is dropped from msxml6. It seems like there will be browser issues even in a pure IE shop. The proposed solutions I found for these problems have almost scared me off client-side processing. Does jQuery promise any future-proofing along these lines? -- Dave
-- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
