Got you, I'll create my custom policyprovider.
Thanks for the idea.
On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 1:40:17 PM UTC+1 lukas...@gmail.com wrote:
> You don't have to create new configurations all the time. Just implement
> your own PolicyProvider that creates the policies on the fly. Try it,
> measure it.
>
> If you're afraid (due to measurements) that overheads will be too high,
> you can also work with thread locals or whatever context provider to access
> your authenticated user from the policy predicate.
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:42 PM 'Joaquin' via jOOQ User Group <
> jooq...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> what's the overhead to it? is it fine to pass the policy provider
>> deriving the configuration everytime?
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 24, 2025 at 9:15:36 AM UTC+1 lukas...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Just create your policies at runtime rather than at configuration time.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:40 AM 'Joaquin' via jOOQ User Group <
>>> jooq...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> I created an inherited policy with jooq, but it seems to get evaluted
>>>> during initialization with Spring Boot.
>>>>
>>>> this is my setup:
>>>>
>>>> @Bean
>>>> DefaultConfigurationCustomizer
>>>> defaultConfigurationCustomizer(CustomPolicyProvider
>>>> customPolicyProvider) {
>>>> return configuration -> {
>>>> configuration.setRecordListener(new JooqRecordListener());
>>>>
>>>> configuration.settings().setEmulateNestedRecordProjectionsUsingMultisetEmulation(
>>>> true);
>>>> configuration.setPolicyProvider(customPolicyProvider);
>>>> };
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> the constructor of my policyProvider is done this way:
>>>>
>>>> public CustomPolicyProvider(AuthenticationFacade authenticationFacade)
>>>> {
>>>> this.append(new CustomPolicy<>(TABLE, () -> TABLE.child().ID.eq(
>>>> authenticationFacade.getAuthenticatedUser().userId())), ANOTHER_TABLE
>>>> .child()));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> what happens is that this fails because the authenticationFacade is
>>>> actually null during startup which makes sense, this works properly when
>>>> I'm not using an inherited policy.
>>>>
>>>> any ideas on how to get it working?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "jOOQ User Group" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to jooq-user+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/293ed01d-6a53-4e73-8239-d5378f4305efn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/293ed01d-6a53-4e73-8239-d5378f4305efn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "jOOQ User Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to jooq-user+...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/34fc7699-e1e5-4775-83ca-f68e9010d005n%40googlegroups.com
>>
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/34fc7699-e1e5-4775-83ca-f68e9010d005n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/bbe0e814-1b28-48a1-bb2d-64aee1485803n%40googlegroups.com.
