That’s diff(a la emacs) of the original pom.xml with my version. I question line six of the pom, but I’m not a maven user these days.
And, to main point, overloaded table returning functions still duplicate columns > On Nov 27, 2020, at 8:13 AM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 4:03 PM Rob Sargent <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, old news. And in 3.14.3 as well (but you expected that, I believe). I >> can rework the function definition. > > I'm not sure what you mean. There have been hundreds of closed issues in > version 3.14, not all of which backported to 3.13. It's always worth checking > if a bug persists with the latest published version... > >> I see I didn't fill in my "pom[1]" footnote originally. Is line 6 of the >> pom.xml correct? I think it's a little early to reference >> "${org.jooq.groupId}" >> --- a/pom.xml >> +++ b/pom.xml >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ >> <modelVerions>4.0.0</modelVersion> >> >> - ${org.jooq.groupId} >> + org.jooq > > I'm not sure what this is about? > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAB4ELO7LojY%3D-Ew%3DHPYyz207Hor2oWJ%3DvYAYLpBjwKqBAq%3Dy0g%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/840B7715-6B00-42BD-8ED1-0B227E65AAA6%40gmail.com.
