2018-02-16 16:41 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > > Looking for some feedback on those approaches, >
That certainly does sound very interesting - I'll lurk and see whether the community has some feedback... > and whether they can be implemented in jOOQ 3.10 through customization, > Sure, looks like a job for either custom Converter or Binding types: https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/custom-data-types https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/custom-data-type-bindings I'll be happy to answer any specific questions that you may have. > and whether some variation of the above might make sense to be built into > jOOQ? > At this stage, I feel like an out-of-the-box solution from jOOQ might be over engineered. Thanks, Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
