I think this is a bug.
Have following table definition:
public final static Table TableName = DSL.table(DSL.name(
CEntityCarPostingLink.class.getSimpleName()));
public final static Field<CUUID> ObjectID = DSL.field(DSL.name(
"ObjectID"), SQLDataType.BLOB.nullable(false).asConvertedDataType(new
CUUIDConverter())); private final CUUID m_ObjectID;
JooqContext.createTableIfNotExists(TableName)
.column(ObjectID)
.constraints(DSL.constraint(TableName.toString() + "_" +
ObjectID.toString()).primaryKey(ObjectID))
.execute();
The code for the converter is:
public final class CUUIDConverter implements Converter<byte[], CUUID> {
@Override public CUUID from(byte[] T) { return T == null ? null : new
CUUID(T); }
@Override public byte[] to(CUUID U) { return U == null ? null : U.bytes
(); }
@Override public Class<byte[]> fromType() { return byte[].class; }
@Override public Class<CUUID> toType() { return CUUID.class; }
}
When writing to the database, i.e. doing insert or update, I feed an
instance of CUUID and Jooq converts it to a byte-array and writes to
database.
Yet, when reading from database, I get a ClassCastException.
In the debugger I think I pinpointed to
...
42 package org.jooq.impl;
...
113 @SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
114 abstract class AbstractRecord extends AbstractStore implements Record {
...
222
223 @Override
224 public final <T> T get(Field<T> field) {
225 return (T) get(indexOrFail(fieldsRow(), field));
226 }
227
...
Shouldn't the get-Method invoke the Converter / Binding assigned to the
field, instead of doing simply a cast to T?
Best
Bjoern
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
