tombentley commented on a change in pull request #11672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11672#discussion_r800800519



##########
File path: core/src/test/scala/kafka/common/InterBrokerSendThreadTest.scala
##########
@@ -134,36 +139,45 @@ class InterBrokerSendThreadTest {
 
     val clientRequest = new ClientRequest("dest", request, 0, "1", 0, true, 
requestTimeoutMs, handler.handler)
 
-    EasyMock.expect(networkClient.newClientRequest(
-      EasyMock.eq("1"),
-      EasyMock.same(handler.request),
-      EasyMock.anyLong(),
-      EasyMock.eq(true),
-      EasyMock.eq(requestTimeoutMs),
-      EasyMock.same(handler.handler)))
-      .andReturn(clientRequest)
+    when(networkClient.newClientRequest(
+      ArgumentMatchers.eq("1"),
+      same(handler.request),
+      anyLong(),
+      ArgumentMatchers.eq(true),
+      ArgumentMatchers.eq(requestTimeoutMs),
+      same(handler.handler)))
+      .thenReturn(clientRequest)
 
-    EasyMock.expect(networkClient.ready(node, time.milliseconds()))
-      .andReturn(false)
+    when(networkClient.ready(node, time.milliseconds()))
+      .thenReturn(false)
 
-    EasyMock.expect(networkClient.connectionDelay(EasyMock.anyObject(), 
EasyMock.anyLong()))
-      .andReturn(0)
+    when(networkClient.connectionDelay(any[Node], anyLong()))

Review comment:
       Should we be consistent about the parentheses in the argument matchers? 
I assumed before there wasn't consistency in the patchset because you were 
matching the local style in each file, but now I notice instances like this I'm 
not sure what criteria you're using.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to