[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17457487#comment-17457487
]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-13500:
-----------------------------------------
Right... My bad.
> Consider adding a dedicated standby consumer
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-13500
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13500
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: streams
> Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
> Priority: Minor
>
> We currently use the restore consumer to recover state for active tasks and
> to maintain standby tasks during regular processing. This setup has a few
> disadvantages
> # During state recovery, we might want to apply different consumer configs
> compared to standby maintenance during regular processing.
> # It make monitoring confusing: because we never commit offsets for
> changelog topics, users can only monitor the client's "lag metric" to
> observer restore progress (without the need to register a restore listener).
> However, if they are interesting in a restore metric, during regular
> processing it would report the standby lag, which can be rather confusing.
> Because the restore consumer does not use consumer group management, it seems
> to be low overhead to actually use a third consumer, because there won't be
> any heartbeat thread.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)