showuon commented on a change in pull request #8712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8712#discussion_r448099358
##########
File path:
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/InternalTopicManagerTest.java
##########
@@ -287,12 +290,124 @@ public void
shouldLogWhenTopicNotFoundAndNotThrowException() {
assertThat(
appender.getMessages(),
- hasItem("stream-thread [" + threadName + "] Topic
internal-topic is unknown or not found, hence not existed yet:" +
- "
org.apache.kafka.common.errors.UnknownTopicOrPartitionException: Topic
internal-topic not found.")
+ hasItem("stream-thread [" + threadName + "] Topic
internal-topic is unknown or not found, hence not existed yet.\n" +
+ "Error message was:
org.apache.kafka.common.errors.UnknownTopicOrPartitionException: Topic
internal-topic not found.")
);
}
}
+ @Test
+ public void
shouldCreateTopicWhenTopicLeaderNotAvailableAndThenTopicNotFound() {
+ final AdminClient admin = EasyMock.createNiceMock(AdminClient.class);
+ final InternalTopicManager topicManager = new
InternalTopicManager(admin, new StreamsConfig(config));
+
+ final KafkaFutureImpl<TopicDescription>
topicDescriptionLeaderNotAvailableFuture = new KafkaFutureImpl<>();
+ topicDescriptionLeaderNotAvailableFuture.completeExceptionally(new
LeaderNotAvailableException("Leader Not Available!"));
+ final KafkaFutureImpl<TopicDescription>
topicDescriptionUnknownTopicFuture = new KafkaFutureImpl<>();
+ topicDescriptionUnknownTopicFuture.completeExceptionally(new
UnknownTopicOrPartitionException("Unknown Topic!"));
+ final KafkaFutureImpl<CreateTopicsResult.TopicMetadataAndConfig>
topicCreationFuture = new KafkaFutureImpl<>();
+
topicCreationFuture.complete(EasyMock.createNiceMock(CreateTopicsResult.TopicMetadataAndConfig.class));
+
+
EasyMock.expect(admin.describeTopics(Collections.singleton(leaderNotAvailableTopic)))
+ .andReturn(new MockDescribeTopicsResult(
+ Collections.singletonMap(leaderNotAvailableTopic,
topicDescriptionLeaderNotAvailableFuture)))
+ .once();
+ // return empty set for 1st time
+ EasyMock.expect(admin.createTopics(Collections.emptySet()))
+ .andReturn(new
MockCreateTopicsResult(Collections.emptyMap())).once();
+
+
EasyMock.expect(admin.describeTopics(Collections.singleton(leaderNotAvailableTopic)))
+ .andReturn(new MockDescribeTopicsResult(
+ Collections.singletonMap(leaderNotAvailableTopic,
topicDescriptionUnknownTopicFuture)))
+ .once();
+ EasyMock.expect(admin.createTopics(Collections.singleton(
+ new NewTopic(leaderNotAvailableTopic, Optional.of(1),
Optional.of((short) 1))
+
.configs(Utils.mkMap(Utils.mkEntry(TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_CONFIG,
TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_DELETE),
+ Utils.mkEntry(TopicConfig.MESSAGE_TIMESTAMP_TYPE_CONFIG,
"CreateTime"),
+ Utils.mkEntry(TopicConfig.SEGMENT_BYTES_CONFIG, "52428800"),
+ Utils.mkEntry(TopicConfig.RETENTION_MS_CONFIG, "-1"))))))
+ .andReturn(new
MockCreateTopicsResult(Collections.singletonMap(leaderNotAvailableTopic,
topicCreationFuture))).once();
+
+ EasyMock.replay(admin);
+
+ final InternalTopicConfig internalTopicConfig = new
RepartitionTopicConfig(leaderNotAvailableTopic, Collections.emptyMap());
+ internalTopicConfig.setNumberOfPartitions(1);
+ final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> topicConfigMap = new
HashMap<>();
+ topicConfigMap.put(leaderNotAvailableTopic, internalTopicConfig);
+ topicManager.makeReady(topicConfigMap);
+
+ EasyMock.verify(admin);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void
shouldCompleteValidateWhenTopicLeaderNotAvailableAndThenDescribeSuccess() {
Review comment:
Yes, they are different scenarios. You can check below diagram for
reference. (red and green for different cases)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
