[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17096237#comment-17096237
]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-7224:
----------------------------------------
This ticket would not reduce intermediate result. Not sure what issue you are
facing with "too many intermediate" results. Are you using `suppress()`
already? If yes, what issue do you face?
Also, wall-clock time suppression does not help to reduce intermediate result,
but it make suppression non-deterministic. I might be helpful for some
user-cases, ie, output rate control. But I am not sure how it relates to your
use case?
> KIP-328: Add spill-to-disk for Suppression
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-7224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7224
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: streams
> Reporter: John Roesler
> Priority: Major
>
> As described in
> [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-328%3A+Ability+to+suppress+updates+for+KTables]
> Following on KAFKA-7223, implement the spill-to-disk buffering strategy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
