[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16809660#comment-16809660
]
Viktor Somogyi-Vass edited comment on KAFKA-6598 at 4/4/19 9:23 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[~ijuma], [~cmccabe] do you have any info if this work is still pending or
dropped?
was (Author: viktorsomogyi):
[~ijuma] do you have any info if this work is still pending or dropped?
> Kafka to support using ETCD beside Zookeeper
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-6598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6598
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: clients, core
> Reporter: Sebastian Toader
> Priority: Major
>
> The current Kafka implementation is bound to {{Zookeeper}} to store its
> metadata for forming a cluster of nodes (producer/consumer/broker).
> As Kafka is becoming popular for streaming in various environments where
> {{Zookeeper}} is either not easy to deploy/manage or there are better
> alternatives to it there is a need
> to run Kafka with other metastore implementation than {{Zookeeper}}.
> {{etcd}} can provide the same semantics as {{Zookeeper}} for Kafka and since
> {{etcd}} is the favorable choice in certain environments (e.g. Kubernetes)
> Kafka should be able to run with {{etcd}}.
> From the user's point of view should be straightforward to configure to use
> {{etcd}} by just simply specifying a connection string that point to {{etcd}}
> cluster.
> To avoid introducing instability the original interfaces should be kept and
> only the low level {{Zookeeper}} API calls should be replaced with \{{etcd}}
> API calls in case Kafka is configured
> to use {{etcd}}.
> On the long run (which is out of scope of this jira) there should be an
> abstract layer in Kafka which then various metastore implementations would
> implement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
