chickenchickenlove commented on code in PR #20968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20968#discussion_r2868231106


##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/graph/ProcessorParameters.java:
##########
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ public ProcessorParameters(final 
FixedKeyProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, VOut> proce
     public ProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, KOut, VOut> processorSupplier() {
         return processorSupplier;
     }
+    
+    public ProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, KOut, VOut> 
wrappedProcessSupplier(final InternalTopologyBuilder topologyBuilder) {
+        ApiUtils.checkSupplier(processorSupplier);
+        return topologyBuilder.wrapProcessorSupplier(processorName, 
processorSupplier);
+    }
 

Review Comment:
   _so might be good to add a parallel wrappedFixedKeyProcessSupplier method_
   
   It makes sense to me! 
   By the way, since `wrappedFixedKeyProcessSupplier` doesn’t seem to be 
related to the `TableSource` optimization, how about handling it in a separate 
issue and PR to minimize the review scope?
   
   Let me know your opinion! 



##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/graph/ProcessorParameters.java:
##########
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ public ProcessorParameters(final 
FixedKeyProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, VOut> proce
     public ProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, KOut, VOut> processorSupplier() {
         return processorSupplier;
     }
+    
+    public ProcessorSupplier<KIn, VIn, KOut, VOut> 
wrappedProcessSupplier(final InternalTopologyBuilder topologyBuilder) {
+        ApiUtils.checkSupplier(processorSupplier);
+        return topologyBuilder.wrapProcessorSupplier(processorName, 
processorSupplier);
+    }
 

Review Comment:
   _so might be good to add a parallel wrappedFixedKeyProcessSupplier method_
   
   It makes sense to me! 
   By the way, since `wrappedFixedKeyProcessSupplier` doesn’t seem to be 
related to the `TableSource` optimization, how about handling it in a separate 
issue and PR to minimize the review scope?
   
   Let me know your thoughts! 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to