m1a2st commented on code in PR #19803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19803#discussion_r2106231485


##########
metadata/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/metadata/MetadataCache.java:
##########
@@ -148,56 +147,53 @@ DescribeTopicPartitionsResponseData describeTopicResponse(
         boolean ignoreTopicsWithExceptions);
 
     static Cluster toCluster(String clusterId, MetadataImage image) {
-        Map<Integer, List<Node>> brokerToNodes = new HashMap<>();
-        image.cluster().brokers().values().stream()
-            .filter(broker -> !broker.fenced())
-            .forEach(broker -> brokerToNodes.put(broker.id(), broker.nodes()));
+        Map<Integer, Node> nodesById = 
image.cluster().brokers().values().stream()
+            .collect(Collectors.toMap(BrokerRegistration::id, broker -> 
broker.nodes().get(0)));

Review Comment:
   I'm not sure, but I'm a bit confused — shouldn't the partition leader broker 
not be a fenced broker? In 
[KIP-841](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-841:+Fenced+replicas+should+not+be+allowed+to+join+the+ISR+in+KRaft)
 has following invariants
   
   - a fenced or in-controlled-shutdown replica is not eligible to be in the 
ISR; and
   - a fenced or in-controlled-shutdown replica is not eligible to become 
leader.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to