adixitconfluent commented on code in PR #19437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19437#discussion_r2048452612
##########
core/src/main/java/kafka/server/share/DelayedShareFetch.java:
##########
@@ -277,9 +323,15 @@ public boolean tryComplete() {
return false;
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Error processing delayed share fetch request", e);
- releasePartitionLocks(topicPartitionData.keySet());
- partitionsAcquired.clear();
- partitionsAlreadyFetched.clear();
+ // In case we have a remote fetch exception, we have already
released locks for partitions which have potential
+ // local log read. We do not release locks for partitions which
have a remote storage read because we need to
Review Comment:
Hi @junrao, I'm not sure if I understood your comment correctly. You're
saying that the operation could be completed in a different `onComplete` due to
which the comment here is incorrect? So should I update the comment to `In case
we have a remote fetch exception, we have already released locks for non remote
storage fetch topic partitions. We do not release locks for partitions which
have a remote storage read.` Will this be fine?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
