jsancio commented on code in PR #19163: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19163#discussion_r2012339800
########## clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/protocol/MessageUtil.java: ########## @@ -204,13 +204,17 @@ public static boolean compareRawTaggedFields(List<RawTaggedField> first, } } - public static ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(final Message message, final short version) { + public static ByteBufferAccessor toReadable(final Message message, final short version) { ObjectSerializationCache cache = new ObjectSerializationCache(); int messageSize = message.size(cache, version); ByteBufferAccessor bytes = new ByteBufferAccessor(ByteBuffer.allocate(messageSize)); message.write(bytes, cache, version); bytes.flip(); - return bytes.buffer(); + return bytes; + } + + public static ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(final Message message, final short version) { Review Comment: I agree with @artemlivshits . Why not just remove this method? Any code that wants access to the byte buffer can just call `toReadable(message, version).buffer()`. ########## clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/protocol/MessageUtil.java: ########## @@ -204,13 +204,17 @@ public static boolean compareRawTaggedFields(List<RawTaggedField> first, } } - public static ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(final Message message, final short version) { + public static ByteBufferAccessor toReadable(final Message message, final short version) { Review Comment: How about name this `toByteBufferAccessor`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org