ableegoldman commented on code in PR #17929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17929#discussion_r1867412493


##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/KGroupedStreamImpl.java:
##########
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ private KTable<K, Long> doCount(final Named named, final 
Materialized<K, Long, K
 
         final String name = new 
NamedInternal(named).orElseGenerateWithPrefix(builder, AGGREGATE_NAME);
         return doAggregate(
-            new KStreamAggregate<>(materializedInternal.storeName(), 
aggregateBuilder.countInitializer, aggregateBuilder.countAggregator),
+            new KStreamAggregate<>(materializedInternal, 
aggregateBuilder.countInitializer, aggregateBuilder.countAggregator),

Review Comment:
   ah sorry I forgot to respond to this earlier -- basically you're right that 
we ultimately need to remove it from `StateProcessorNode` but  we need to 
convert a bunch of other stuff to implement `#stores` before we can do this. I 
put `StatefulProcessorNode`  on our TODO list with a note to say it should be 
picked up last.
   
   In the meantime, it doesn't hurt to add the store twice. The 
InternalTopologyBuilder has checks for this (see 
`StoreFactory#isCompatibleWith`)
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to