adixitconfluent commented on code in PR #17739:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17739#discussion_r1841166853
##########
core/src/main/java/kafka/server/share/SharePartition.java:
##########
@@ -1602,8 +1602,6 @@ protected void
updateFetchOffsetMetadata(Optional<LogOffsetMetadata> fetchOffset
protected Optional<LogOffsetMetadata> fetchOffsetMetadata() {
lock.readLock().lock();
try {
- if (findNextFetchOffset.get())
Review Comment:
@junrao, so, should I do what I suggested
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17739#discussion_r1838763754 here, that
when the call goes to fetchOffsetMetadata(), we check if `findNextFetchOffset`
is true or not, in case it is true, we do a call to nextFetchOffset() which
will correctly update the endOffset if it needs to be updated or not. Finally,
we just return fetchOffsetMetadata OR for the uncommon case, I update the
`fetchOffsetMetadata` to Optional.empty() and remove any dependency on
`findNextFetchOffset`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
