kamalcph commented on code in PR #16959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16959#discussion_r1732085995
##########
core/src/main/java/kafka/log/remote/RemoteLogManager.java:
##########
@@ -1254,7 +1265,10 @@ void cleanupExpiredRemoteLogSegments() throws
RemoteStorageException, ExecutionE
canProcess = false;
continue;
}
- if
(RemoteLogSegmentState.DELETE_SEGMENT_FINISHED.equals(metadata.state())) {
+ // skip the COPY_SEGMENT_STARTED segments since they might
be the dangling segments that failed before
+ // and blocks the normal segment deletion, ex: it failed
`isRemoteSegmentWithinLeaderEpochs` check... etc
+ if
(RemoteLogSegmentState.DELETE_SEGMENT_FINISHED.equals(metadata.state()) ||
+
RemoteLogSegmentState.COPY_SEGMENT_STARTED.equals(metadata.state())) {
Review Comment:
Ok, got the reason for including the `COPY_SEGMENT_STARTED` state together
with this check. When the dangling segments gets deleted, the event state is
still set to "COPY_SEGMENT_STARTED" and the expiry thread will call the
RemoteStorageManager#deleteLogSegmentData again. For my understanding, why are
we not changing the state to `DELETE_SEGMENT_FINISHED`?
I think it should be ok, since we mentioned the below in the javadoc
contract:
https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/apache/kafka@trunk/-/blob/storage/api/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/log/remote/storage/RemoteStorageManager.java?L146
```
* This operation is expected to be idempotent. If resources are not
found, it is not expected to
* throw {@link RemoteResourceNotFoundException} as it may be already
removed from a previous attempt
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
