[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brett Rann updated KAFKA-7137:
------------------------------
    Description: 
Just spent some time wrapping my head around the inner workings of compaction 
and tombstoning, with a view to providing guarantees for deleting previous 
values of tombstoned keys from kafka within a desired time.

There's a couple of good posts that touch on this:
https://www.confluent.io/blog/handling-gdpr-log-forget/
http://www.shayne.me/blog/2015/2015-06-25-everything-about-kafka-part-2/

Basically, log.cleaner.min.cleanable.ratio or min.cleanable.dirty.ratio is 
hijacked to force aggressive compaction (by setting it to 0, or 0.000000001 
depending on what you read), and along with segment.ms can provide timing 
guarantees that a tombstone will result in any other values for the key will be 
deleted within a desired time.

But that sacrifices the utility of min.cleanable.dirty.ratio (and to a lesser 
extent, control over segment sizes).  On any duplicate key and a new segment 
roll it will run compaction, when otherwise it might be preferrable to allow a 
more generous dirty.ratio in the case of plain old duplicates.

It would be useful to have control over triggering a compaction without losing 
the utility of the dirty.ratio setting.

The pure need here is to specify a minimum time for the log cleaner to run (or 
a maximum time where it doesn't run!) on a topic that has keys replaced by a 
tombstone message that are past the minimum retention times provided by 
min.compaction.lag.ms

Something like a log.cleaner.max.delay.ms, and an API to trigger compaction, 
with some nuances to be fleshed out.

Does this make sense, and sound like it's worth a KIP? I'd be happy to write 
something up.

In the mean time, this can be worked around with some duct tape:

* make sure any values you want deleted by a tombstone have passed min 
retention configs
* set global log.cleaner.io.max.bytes.per.second to what you want for the 
compaction task
* set topic min.cleanable.dirty.ratio=0 for the topic
* set a small segment.ms
* wait for a new segment to roll (ms + a message coming in) and wait for 
compaction to kick in. GDPR met!
* undo the hacks


  was:
Just spent some time wrapping my head around the inner workings of compaction 
and tombstoning, with a view to providing guarantees for deleting previous 
values of tombstoned keys from kafka within a desired time.

There's a couple of good posts that touch on this:
https://www.confluent.io/blog/handling-gdpr-log-forget/
http://www.shayne.me/blog/2015/2015-06-25-everything-about-kafka-part-2/

Basically, log.cleaner.min.cleanable.ratio or min.cleanable.dirty.ratio is 
hijacked to force aggressive compaction (by setting it to 0, or 0.000000001 
depending on what you read), and along with segment.ms can provide timing 
guarantees that a tombstone will result in any other values for the key will be 
deleted within a desired time.

But that sacrifices the utility of min.cleanable.dirty.ratio (and to a lesser 
extent, control over segment sizes).  On any duplicate key and a new segment 
roll it will run compaction, when otherwise it might be preferrable to allow a 
more generous dirty.ratio in the case of plain old duplicates.

It would be useful to have control over triggering a compaction without losing 
the utility of the dirty.ratio setting.

The pure need here is to specify a minimum time for the log cleaner to run on a 
topic that has keys replaced by a tombstone message that are past the minimum 
retention times provided by min.compaction.lag.ms

Something like a log.cleaner.max.delay.ms, and an API to trigger compaction, 
with some nuances to be fleshed out.

Does this make sense, and sound like it's worth a KIP? I'd be happy to write 
something up.

In the mean time, this can be worked around with some duct tape:

* make sure any values you want deleted by a tombstone have passed min 
retention configs
* set global log.cleaner.io.max.bytes.per.second to what you want for the 
compaction task
* set topic min.cleanable.dirty.ratio=0 for the topic
* set a small segment.ms
* wait for a new segment to roll (ms + a message coming in) and wait for 
compaction to kick in. GDPR met!
* undo the hacks



> ability to trigger compaction for tombstoning and GDPR
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-7137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7137
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Brett Rann
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Just spent some time wrapping my head around the inner workings of compaction 
> and tombstoning, with a view to providing guarantees for deleting previous 
> values of tombstoned keys from kafka within a desired time.
> There's a couple of good posts that touch on this:
> https://www.confluent.io/blog/handling-gdpr-log-forget/
> http://www.shayne.me/blog/2015/2015-06-25-everything-about-kafka-part-2/
> Basically, log.cleaner.min.cleanable.ratio or min.cleanable.dirty.ratio is 
> hijacked to force aggressive compaction (by setting it to 0, or 0.000000001 
> depending on what you read), and along with segment.ms can provide timing 
> guarantees that a tombstone will result in any other values for the key will 
> be deleted within a desired time.
> But that sacrifices the utility of min.cleanable.dirty.ratio (and to a lesser 
> extent, control over segment sizes).  On any duplicate key and a new segment 
> roll it will run compaction, when otherwise it might be preferrable to allow 
> a more generous dirty.ratio in the case of plain old duplicates.
> It would be useful to have control over triggering a compaction without 
> losing the utility of the dirty.ratio setting.
> The pure need here is to specify a minimum time for the log cleaner to run 
> (or a maximum time where it doesn't run!) on a topic that has keys replaced 
> by a tombstone message that are past the minimum retention times provided by 
> min.compaction.lag.ms
> Something like a log.cleaner.max.delay.ms, and an API to trigger compaction, 
> with some nuances to be fleshed out.
> Does this make sense, and sound like it's worth a KIP? I'd be happy to write 
> something up.
> In the mean time, this can be worked around with some duct tape:
> * make sure any values you want deleted by a tombstone have passed min 
> retention configs
> * set global log.cleaner.io.max.bytes.per.second to what you want for the 
> compaction task
> * set topic min.cleanable.dirty.ratio=0 for the topic
> * set a small segment.ms
> * wait for a new segment to roll (ms + a message coming in) and wait for 
> compaction to kick in. GDPR met!
> * undo the hacks



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to