artemlivshits commented on code in PR #13391: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13391#discussion_r1152479391
########## core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/AddPartitionsToTxnManager.scala: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package kafka.server + +import kafka.common.{InterBrokerSendThread, RequestAndCompletionHandler} +import org.apache.kafka.clients.{ClientResponse, NetworkClient, RequestCompletionHandler} +import org.apache.kafka.common.{InvalidRecordException, Node, TopicPartition} +import org.apache.kafka.common.message.AddPartitionsToTxnRequestData.{AddPartitionsToTxnTransaction, AddPartitionsToTxnTransactionCollection} +import org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.Errors +import org.apache.kafka.common.requests.{AddPartitionsToTxnRequest, AddPartitionsToTxnResponse} +import org.apache.kafka.common.utils.Time + +import java.util.Collections +import scala.collection.mutable + +object AddPartitionsToTxnManager { + type AppendCallback = Map[TopicPartition, Errors] => Unit +} + + +class TransactionDataAndCallbacks(val transactionData: AddPartitionsToTxnTransactionCollection, + val callbacks: mutable.Map[String, AddPartitionsToTxnManager.AppendCallback]) + + +class AddPartitionsToTxnManager(config: KafkaConfig, client: NetworkClient, time: Time) + extends InterBrokerSendThread("AddPartitionsToTxnSenderThread-" + config.brokerId, client, config.requestTimeoutMs, time) { + + private val inflightNodes = mutable.HashSet[Node]() + private val nodesToTransactions = mutable.Map[Node, TransactionDataAndCallbacks]() + + def addTxnData(node: Node, transactionData: AddPartitionsToTxnTransaction, callback: AddPartitionsToTxnManager.AppendCallback): Unit = { + // Check if we have already (either node or individual transaction). + val currentNodeAndTransactionDataOpt = nodesToTransactions.get(node) + currentNodeAndTransactionDataOpt match { + case None => + nodesToTransactions.put(node, + new TransactionDataAndCallbacks(new AddPartitionsToTxnTransactionCollection(Collections.singletonList(transactionData).iterator()), + mutable.Map(transactionData.transactionalId() -> callback))) + case Some(currentNodeAndTransactionData) => + // Check if we already have txn ID -- this should only happen in epoch bump case. If so, we should return error for old entry and remove from queue. + val currentTransactionData = currentNodeAndTransactionData.transactionData.find(transactionData.transactionalId) + if (currentTransactionData != null) { + if (currentTransactionData.producerEpoch() < transactionData.producerEpoch()) { + val topicPartitionsToError = mutable.Map[TopicPartition, Errors]() + currentTransactionData.topics().forEach { topic => + topic.partitions().forEach { partition => + topicPartitionsToError.put(new TopicPartition(topic.name(), partition), Errors.INVALID_PRODUCER_EPOCH) + } + } + val oldCallback = currentNodeAndTransactionData.callbacks(transactionData.transactionalId()) + currentNodeAndTransactionData.transactionData.remove(transactionData) + oldCallback(topicPartitionsToError.toMap) + } else { + // We should never see a request on the same epoch since we haven't finished handling the one in queue Review Comment: Duplicate check + store has to be atomic (cannot really discard a new request as a duplicate until the previous request succeeds, not can let it go through until the previous request fails), so it needs to happen under a lock. The purpose of this stage is to not let a request go into log if the transaction is not there, so it got to be either between the check and the store or before the check and the store, hopefully, it's the latter, because otherwise we'd have a long lock around inter-broker RPC. BTW, there should be no out-of-order errors or fenced errors during normal retry processing -- the first try should go through and others would be bounced with "duplicate" error which is effectively a success. This way all tries would be effectively successful and the intermittent error would be transparently handled by Kafka without bubbling up to the application. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
