hachikuji commented on code in PR #12265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12265#discussion_r915323373


##########
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/metadata/BrokerMetadataSnapshotter.scala:
##########
@@ -45,26 +45,37 @@ class BrokerMetadataSnapshotter(
    */
   private var _currentSnapshotOffset = -1L
 
+  /**
+   * The offset of the newest snapshot, or -1 if there hasn't been one. 
Accessed only under
+   * the object lock.
+   */
+  private var _latestSnapshotOffset = -1L

Review Comment:
   Do we need to initialize this on startup? If we don't, is it possible that 
we would end up snapshotting the same offset more than once?



##########
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/metadata/BrokerMetadataSnapshotter.scala:
##########
@@ -45,26 +45,37 @@ class BrokerMetadataSnapshotter(
    */
   private var _currentSnapshotOffset = -1L
 
+  /**
+   * The offset of the newest snapshot, or -1 if there hasn't been one. 
Accessed only under
+   * the object lock.
+   */
+  private var _latestSnapshotOffset = -1L
+
   /**
    * The event queue which runs this listener.
    */
   val eventQueue = new KafkaEventQueue(time, logContext, 
threadNamePrefix.getOrElse(""))
 
   override def maybeStartSnapshot(lastContainedLogTime: Long, image: 
MetadataImage): Boolean = synchronized {
-    if (_currentSnapshotOffset == -1L) {
+    if (_currentSnapshotOffset != -1) {
+      warn(s"Declining to create a new snapshot at 
${image.highestOffsetAndEpoch()} because " +

Review Comment:
   Do you think the log level is right for these messages? It seems like these 
are "normal" things that can happen and not an indication of a problem. Perhaps 
we can make them info or debug level.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to