[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16183203#comment-16183203
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-5932:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user bbejeck opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3978

    KAFKA-5932: Avoid call to fetchPrevious in FlushListeners

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/bbejeck/kafka 
KAFKA-5932_no_fetch_previous_when_no_old_values_returned

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3978.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3978
    
----
commit 1fa488d55af6cf9ca3898274e15a3dbe703eaea7
Author: Bill Bejeck <b...@confluent.io>
Date:   2017-09-27T20:26:12Z

    KAFKA-5932: Avoid call to fetchPrevious in FlushListeners

----


> Avoid call fetchPrevious in FlushListeners
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-5932
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5932
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Guozhang Wang
>            Assignee: Bill Bejeck
>
> When caching is turned on for a window or session store, upon {{store.put()}} 
> the cache may gets flushed, trigger the dirty flush listener calling 
> {{maybeForward()}}, which calls {{fetchPrevious()}}.
> Unfortunately {{fetchPrevious()}} could be a very expensive call to make, and 
> sometimes are not necessary:
> 1. When {{KStreamWindowAggregate.process()}} already gets the previous value 
> when aggregating, so we could passing the old value through the tuple 
> forwarder without calling fetchPrevious again.
> 2. When we know that {{sendOldValues}} flag is turned off.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to